500 Russian Lives for One Sentence
Putin Got His Handshake. Ukraine Got His Army.
Was it luck? For a few minutes, watching Putin board the plane he came in and leave empty-handed, that thought flickered.
No, this wasn't luck. This moment proves how crucial it is to stay focused, even when everything seems to be collapsing around you.
Russian generals, desperate to hand Putin a propaganda victory, sent hundreds of soldiers on a suicide mission. Small units infiltrated north of Pokrovsk—ones and threes at first, then more began following. They wanted to throw battalion after battalion into the breach, but Ukraine moved too fast.
The incursion had penetrated nearly 10 kilometers. Multiple Russian battalions were guarding the breakthrough's entry points while heavy weapons rolled in over 48 hours. But Ukraine didn't let the situation develop. They understood the stakes: a battlefield victory that could shift the narrative, even slightly, in Putin's favor during the Alaska meeting.
Hours before the meeting, Ukraine struck with precision and overwhelming force. They crushed the incursion right at its center, splitting the Russian advance in two. All those Russian troops in the yellow circle—hundreds of them—were gone. Cut off, surrounded, and will soon be eliminated. The survivors below the breach line would now understand exactly why they'd been sent to die: to give Putin one extra sentence, one small boast, when he sat across from Trump in Alaska.
Think about that calculation. Five hundred to one thousand Russian lives—young men with families, futures, dreams—all spent for what? A single talking point. One sentence in a diplomatic meeting. And this man calls himself the father of Russia.
Father of dead Russians would be more accurate. Father of the sacrificed. Father of the expendable. Father of cannon fodder.
But Ukraine denied him even that meager prize. Their decision to strike hard and fast—to commit maximum force rather than let the situation drag on—was brilliant. They understood that in modern warfare, timing isn't just tactical; it's political. Every hour that incursion held would have been magnified in Putin's rhetoric.
The meeting itself told the story. The Guardian's David Smith captured it perfectly—no need to dig through dozens of reports.
The U.S. president, who typically can never resist talking and talking, left the stage without answering any of them.
(And here's something I genuinely respect) — First Lady Melania Trump reportedly wrote a personal letter to Putin about returning the children he abducted from Ukraine, which Trump hand-delivered.
She could have stayed silent, played it safe, done nothing. But she didn't. Some will say it was calculated, a publicity move. So what? I want powerful people seeking recognition by aligning with moral causes. That's how change happens. That letter, whatever its motivation, put the spotlight on the stolen children. That was a respectable move.
But the biggest victory of the day? Trump didn't take Putin's bait. Make no mistake: Putin came prepared with his KGB playbook, some carefully crafted wedge designed to crack the alliance between America and Europe. That's his obsession, his strategic imperative—breaking Western unity.
That relationship between the US and Europe—the one Putin has mocked, dismissed, claimed was fracturing—has been tightening since July 11th. It started simply: Trump began talking regularly with European leaders. Then those conversations shifted to weapons sales—American systems for NATO and then to Ukraine. One discussion led to another, and the momentum has been building ever since. Putin knows this. He sees it. And it's making him desperate.
He came to Alaska carrying that desperation like luggage. He needed something, anything, to crack this growing US-Europe military partnership. A softening of sanctions. A pause in weapons deliveries.
Even just a rhetorical wedge he could exploit.
He left with that same desperation, heavier now. Because despite whatever charm offensive or strategic pitch he deployed, he couldn't talk his way into what he needed most: stopping the flow of weapons to Europe
That's a massive win for the alliance. Massive.
Now, Putin did extract one small victory from this theater. By showing up, by going through the motions of diplomacy, he essentially forced Trump into a corner. Trump now has to say positive things about the meeting—"productive discussions," "frank exchange," all that diplomatic foam. And Trump can't immediately pivot to announcing new sanctions. He can't say, "Oh, I had a great productive meeting, and here's a fresh list of sanctions because I didn't like what Putin said."
The optics would be impossible.
That was Putin's win. But here's the thing—Putin always knew the structural gain was just in his arrival. The mere fact of the meeting, the handshake, the photo op. It buys him a few weeks of diplomatic breathing room, makes him look less isolated on the world stage. It also stopped Trump from piling up the sanctions.
He knew it. He got it.
But that's all he got. Nothing more.
If there ever was a time for Europe to stop talking about Putin, that time is now. Don't push Trump on Russia sanctions. Don't demand immediate condemnation. You'll only force him into an optical corner, make him dig in defensively, and ultimately hurt your own position.
Instead, focus on wins.
Concrete, deliverable wins that Trump can claim full ownership of.
Focus on massive weapons deals. Not small, symbolic packages—big, headline-grabbing contracts. Focus on buying the exact strike weapons systems the Americans use themselves. Make it a show of allied unity and American industrial might. Place those orders publicly.
Build momentum through action, not rhetoric.
Create a narrative Trump can sell: "Our allies are buying American. They're investing in American defense technology. They're strengthening NATO with American weapons." Give him those wins.
Stack them up, one after another.
Only then—only after you've untied your position from the Trump-Putin dynamic, only after you've given Trump his victories—can you circle back to talking about Putin and further pressure on Russia.
Trump will desperately need wins in the coming months. His domestic situation demands it. If you can separate your agenda from the toxic optics of the Trump-Putin relationship, if you can give him paths to victory that don't require him to publicly confront Putin, you massively improve the odds of getting what you actually need: continued weapons flows to Ukraine, continued alliance unity.
And maybe, after some time, new sanctions. Trump may go there on his own—the economic pressure tools are too valuable to abandon forever. But now is not the time to push in that direction. And certainly not in a public manner. Public pressure will only make him dig in. Private patience might let him arrive there himself.
Play the long game. Let Putin have his photo op. Focus on building leverage through action, not demanding it through words.
Your support helps The Concis fly the flag for Ukraine—and for every democracy—a little stronger, a little higher.
For the first time since yesterday afternoon I don’t feel sick. This analysis is sheer brilliance. I hope the Europeans follow your recommendations. You have assessed Trump’s psychology very well. I ran him down in many comments and feel a bit foolish. Not that he deserves praise, but it was mishandling in the moment. I want him to move away from Putin. It is a desperate situation and must be handled diplomatically—no bruising the ego.
I am persuaded. This was no easy sell as I am very angry. But your batting average is so good. You have not led me astray on these matters even once over months and months. Thank you. And glory to Ukraine.
Great post and perspective. I agree with your position that Putin came to Alaska carrying his desperation like luggage. He needed something - anything - to fracture the U.S.-Europe partnership: a pause in weapons, a crack in sanctions, the faintest sign of weakness. For Ukraine, the message is clear: there is no trust to be found in Putin, in Trump, or in America itself.
Putin seeks Ukraine’s destruction. Trump treats it as a bargaining chip. And America, distracted and divided, is no longer a steady hand.
For Kyiv, survival rests on its own resolve and on Europe’s commitment, not on the shifting promises of Washington. Caveat emptor.