The $4.5 Trillion Tax Fight That Won’t Reach You
This isn’t mass politics. It’s asset protection.
Back in 2017, Republicans spoke like prophets at the gates of economic paradise. Donald Trump declared the cuts “significant”—the likes of which had never been seen. Mnuchin swore they'd “pay for themselves.” Paul Ryan called it a middle-class gift: fairer, simpler, felt in every paycheck. And Mitch McConnell, never one to oversell, said the American economy was finally ready “to take off.”
It didn’t.
The 2017 tax cuts disproportionately benefited the wealthy.
The top 1% walked away with an average cut of $61,090. The bottom 60%? Less than $500.
GDP growth in 2018 hit 2.9%—the same as in 2015, before the cuts. By 2019, it dropped to 2.3%.
No boom. No trickle. No payoff. The Congressional Budget Office later confirmed what everyone already knew: the cuts didn’t pay for themselves. They added nearly $2 trillion in debt, with the bill quietly routed to the future—to be paid by the same people who never got a raise from the policy.
So the GOP handed the gains upward and buried the cost downward. A classic play. What’s different now is: they know the trick’s no longer selling.
When was the last time you heard a Republican say “it’ll pay for itself”? 2017.
That line died with the numbers. No one’s buying, and more importantly, they’re not even pitching. The new sales job is limp by comparison: protect the cuts, or taxes will rise. But for whom? The public has already tuned it out.
Voters today are talking about rent spikes, medical debt, vanishing child care. The GOP isn’t offering relief for any of it. Just a war to preserve a tax cut most people forgot they got—and most never really did.
There’s no pressure from below this time. No voter base banging on the doors demanding another tax cut. Most Americans won’t notice whether the cuts expire or not. Some might even welcome it, if it meant funding programs they actually use—healthcare, housing, climate. That’s the part the GOP can’t say out loud. Because here’s the quiet math: they’re willing to risk blowback over spending cuts, because they know the real cost of inaction will come from above.
From donors. From trade groups. From the parts of the economy that did notice those tax cuts and will feel them vanish.
So they’re running full steam into a $4.5 trillion fight with no grassroots support, no clear economic justification, and no electoral upside. Not because it’s good policy. Not because it’s popular.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Concis to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.