The Concis

The Concis

Share this post

The Concis
The Concis
MAGA Doesn’t Travel Well
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Geopolitics

MAGA Doesn’t Travel Well

Australia and Canada just reminded the world: copy-paste Trumpism fails — when truth still stands a chance.

Shankar Narayan's avatar
Shankar Narayan
May 04, 2025
∙ Paid
100

Share this post

The Concis
The Concis
MAGA Doesn’t Travel Well
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
9
25
Share

MAGA doesn’t export well. That’s the verdict two democracies delivered last week — quietly, clearly, and with a level of voter precision that should make strategists everywhere sit up.

In Australia, Peter Dutton didn’t just lose the federal election. He lost his own seat. And in a parliamentary system like Australia’s, that distinction matters. You don’t run for Prime Minister directly — you win a seat in Parliament, and your party chooses its leader. Dutton failed the first test.

For years, he leaned into a hard-right posture: anti-immigration, pro-cuts, full-spectrum culture war. His nickname — “Australia’s Trump” — wasn’t just an insult. It was a blueprint he seemed to accept. He thought the same grievance wave that swept the U.S. could be replicated down under. It couldn’t. Australian voters didn’t just reject him. They dismantled him.

In Canada, Pierre Poilievre met a parallel fate. And again — in Canada’s system, you don’t run for Prime Minister as a solo act. You must win your own riding, your own seat, just like every other MP. Poilievre didn’t. Despite leading the Conservative Party, he lost his own district — to a Liberal opponent with no national profile.

Mark Carney’s Liberals didn’t just take government — they anchored a quiet voter rebellion against MAGA mimicry. The symbolism couldn’t be clearer: a technocratic economist, calm and fluent in global policy, beat a professional firestarter.

What happened here isn’t about ideology. It’s about texture. In both countries, voters could smell the import. Dutton and Poilievre weren’t wrong to notice the energy of Trumpism. They were wrong to believe it could be franchised. What plays in the U.S. under the protection of its specific dysfunctions — electoral college insulation, Fox News infrastructure, social media seeding and the slow collapse of public trust in institutions— doesn’t easily land elsewhere. When you take the tone without the soil, you get a costume.

And voters noticed.

There’s been a myth that moderate voters don’t show up — that the center is soft, fatigued, disorganized. But that only holds when politics feels abstract. The moment it feels like the national immune system is being tested, the center stiffens. That’s what happened in both cases. I don’t see them as progressive waves.

I think they are antibodies.

Trump loomed over both elections, not by campaign design, but by voter recognition. He doesn’t have to speak. His silhouette is enough. When voters see a politician too eager to cosplay him — the cadence, the scapegoats, the media wars — they know what’s being attempted. And increasingly, they’re willing to shut it down.

But here’s the caution: this rejection only holds where the information ecosystem still functions. In Australia and Canada, public trust in institutions — while strained — hasn’t fully collapsed. Traditional media still matters. Electoral commissions still hold. Russia’s influence campaigns have been monitored and, in many cases, blocked. Voters still operate with some shared reality.

That’s not the case everywhere. In France, the far right is no longer fringe — it’s a real contender for power. In Germany, the AfD is gaining despite carrying the unmistakable feel of extremism — in tone, in posture, in the stories it tells about the nation. And in Romania, the presidential runoff is now set to feature a hard-right nationalist candidate.

The throughline? The global informational fabric is fraying. Russian influence operations are still active. Social media is saturated. And the line between policy and paranoia is steadily dissolving. When that happens, MAGA doesn’t need to win. It just needs to spread. And once it infects the operating system of a democracy — once facts are optional and emotional warfare is normalized — elections stop being about choice.

They become stress tests.

Australia and Canada, for now, passed theirs. They reminded the world that authenticity still matters, that rage politics with a foreign costume still triggers immune responses, and that the public will still reward calm if it smells real.

But this is not a victory lap. It’s a warning with a short fuse. Because MAGA isn’t just a political brand. It’s an export virus. And the only countries that can resist it are the ones where the truth still stands a chance.

Never before in the history of mankind has a single vote carried so much weight. It matters more than you think it does. It’s not just a civic act — it’s your power. Your voice. Your line of defense.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Concis to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 The Concis
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More